Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 04:06
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 149
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 284
35% 265 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 3FD7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 99.2
Parallax 102
84% 101 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 86.3
81% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reletech M.2 SSD 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM32.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 230 277 254 250 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 649
Write 576
Mixed 344
SusWrite 256
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 29.2
107% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 231
170% 224 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 209%
SK hynix SH920 mSATA 128GB
39GB free
Firmware: 10107L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 223 294 298 309 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 461
Write 306
Mixed 284
SusWrite 279
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 22.7
80% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 192
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 83%
Maxsun 256GB X6 256GB
7GB free
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 53 56 64 64 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 357
Write 88
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 58.9
31% 145 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 1.3
59% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 72.4
DQ Mixed 1.5
33% 82.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 90%
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
71GB free
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 65 69 69 64 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 355
Write 304
Mixed 282
SusWrite 81.1
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 28.6
97% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 82.6
81% 128 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 121 118 124 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 120
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 13.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 3 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B71 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback