Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAXY B360M-M.2
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 02:36
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 41.7
1-Core 24.7
2-Core 49.6
25% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 128
14% 113 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
XFX(1682 E580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 72.4
43% 60.3 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 42
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1203AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 106 52 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 388
Write 400
Mixed 182
SusWrite 84.7
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 27.8
88% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 234
174% 230 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 10 60 54.6" 1280 720 SAM7106 SAMSUNG
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback