Asus G20AJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemAsus G20AJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20AJ
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '16 at 17:07
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 99
2-Core 192
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 372
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 85E9) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 36.2
26% 32.6 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 32.8
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC150S3732G 32GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM05.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 468
Write 49.6
Mixed 90
43% 202 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 8.5
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 23.4
39% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
870GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 170
Mixed 162
126% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.22
89% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20AJ Builds (Compare 964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20AJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback