MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B22
MotherboardMSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191226
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 17:15
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 239
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 654
71% 563 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1349) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72% Very good
Lighting 90.1
Reflection 87.2
Parallax 89.4
73% 88.9 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 79
Splatting 70.1
69% 87 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2130 500GB SSD
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213522
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 102 114 96 125 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 84.1
Write 906
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 125
69% 300 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 0.8
43% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 475
258% 231 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 204%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G26C16U4B.16FD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1920 1017 ACI22C1 VX228
Typical B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) Builds (Compare 4,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) - $108

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback