Intel H81

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel H81  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 16:25
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 46.1
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 40.5
31% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 86.1
8-Core 52.1
10% 69.1 Pts
64-Core 70.2
4% 70.2 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 1.4
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foxin 2.5 inch SATA 256GB SSD
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R630C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 346 361 345 370 349 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 429
Write 331
Mixed 182
SusWrite 344
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 13.3
45% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 68.9
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 96.8
74% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 84%
WD WD2500LPCX-24C6HT0 250GB
42GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 68 65 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 76.6
Write 70.2
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 65.8
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.1
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 641
6% 641 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 72.3" 1360 745 SNYEE03 SONY TV
Typical H81 Builds (Compare 2,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H81

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback