MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 15:17
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 164
2-Core 321
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 1,025
90% 763 Pts
64-Core 2,091
129% 2,091 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
ASRock(1849 5326) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.20.01.10
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
165% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 218
Parallax 411
165% 277 fps
MRender 280
Gravity 253
Splatting 246
211% 259 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 165%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1032 512GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 468 436 414 404 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,942
Write 953
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 451
253% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 70.9
241% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 892
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 819
613% 818 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 216%
Great: 264%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
972GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2836 2865 2904 2798 2671 2352 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2,626
Write 2,994
Mixed 2,816
SusWrite 2,738
632% 2,793 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 91.8
296% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 823
604% 796 MB/s
Poor: 263%
This bench: 400%
Great: 508%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 04.05G05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 93 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 91.8
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%
Toshiba MD04ABA500V 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: FP1T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 87 90 88 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 86.4
Write 84.7
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 87.4
54% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 36.5
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 35.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA7 MSI G273
Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $993
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback