Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120223
Uptime	17.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '23 at 14:04
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 160 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 373 41% 322 Pts	64-Core 385 24% 385 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gainward(10B0 1C03) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 56.1 Reflection 60.2 Parallax 53.4 46% 56.6 fps	MRender 54.3 Gravity 58.5 Splatting 54.7 46% 55.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3401103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 170 369 392 91 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 412 Write 340 Mixed 344 SusWrite 181 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 19 79% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 33.9 76% 154 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 711GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 169 169 169 172 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 138 Mixed 83.4 SusWrite 170 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-009.A00LF 2x4GB 560 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.4% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	165	0"	1280 720	LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	51x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	45x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	42x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	24x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	5x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 327 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16