Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 252%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO690
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 216
2-Core 422
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 779
8-Core 1,405
131% 1,092 Pts
64-Core 3,172
196% 3,172 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 112%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 3006) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 254
Reflection 287
Parallax 267
207% 269 fps
MRender 385
Gravity 221
Splatting 192
209% 266 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 186%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
597GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7801Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2291 2971 2260 1793 1783 1788 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,571
Write 2,944
Mixed 2,844
SusWrite 2,148
593% 2,626 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 79.5
261% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,470
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 1,268
951% 1,276 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 372%
Great: 444%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3822 3979 1251 617 615 603 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,142
Write 4,018
Mixed 2,384
SusWrite 1,815
588% 2,590 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 77.4
263% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,455
DQ Write 1,019
DQ Mixed 1,255
932% 1,243 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 333%
Great: 530%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
177% Outstanding
MC Read 75.8
MC Write 68.5
MC Mixed 66.8
201% 70.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 27.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 177%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 16" 2048 1280 CSO1624
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback