Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-VG4 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '23 at 11:23
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1610-$37 5,236 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 43.2 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 82.7 36% 60.7 Pts	4-Core 84.7 8-Core 87.3 11% 86 Pts	64-Core 69.1 4% 69.1 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 43 Parallax 40.6 31% 40.4 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 41.4 Splatting 29.3 30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 120 103 61 51 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.7% Below average	Read 112 Write 168 Mixed 194 SusWrite 101 33% 144 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 18.9 74% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 45.6 55% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD38G16002 04CB 16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1067, 1067 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 9.1 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 4.9 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	54	32	60	21.5"	1280 720	GSM5839 E2211

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	70x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	50x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	27x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GBUnknownBench 63%, 31 samples	13x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $146

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16