Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS_W550  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3417-A2
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 09:52
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 357
45% 341 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.89
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 19.7
18% 23 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 21
Splatting 21.9
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 147 161 169 176 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 178
Mixed 120
SusWrite 160
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU7CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 20.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 216 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 BNQ790C BenQ E2200HD
Typical CELSIUS_W550 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback