Ciara Q87M-DA

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Ciara Q87M-DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '23 at 06:25
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 203 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 528 54% 437 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 73.3 Reflection 80.5 Parallax 72.9 60% 75.6 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 71.8 59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 211 159 150 26 108 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 381 Mixed 299 SusWrite 147 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 47.4 162% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 196 184% 287 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 115%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 931GB free Firmware: 00.0NS03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 127 114 131 129 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 150 Write 126 Mixed 113 SusWrite 126 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown-033.A00LF 4x4GB 182 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 16.6 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 18.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	4	217	60	60	23.8"	1920 1080	AUS24CC VZ249

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-DA Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Ciara Q87M-DA

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	27x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	16x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	16x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	3x
Fury 240GBHyperX $75Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	3x

RAM
CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 4x4GBCrucialBench 55%, 50 samples	5x
CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 59%, 14 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknown-033.A00LFBench 53%, 182 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16