Galax H310M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Galax H310M (all builds)
Motherboard	GALAX H310M
Memory	16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200219
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '23 at 06:16
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 89 1-Core 118 2-Core 239 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 643 71% 558 Pts	64-Core 598 37% 598 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 35 91 74 38 75 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23% Poor	Read 143 Write 94.7 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 74.8 22% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 9.6 40% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 14 DQ Write 15.4 DQ Mixed 13.9 11% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 100%
Acer RE100 2.5 512GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 138GB free Firmware: W0220A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 226 113 115 115 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 466 Write 239 Mixed 391 SusWrite 187 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 21.1 111% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 31.7 72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8JT 859B CB16GU2666.C8ET 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 15.4 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	25	165	0"	1920 1080

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Galax H310M

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	30x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	26x
Pentium Gold G5400Intel $55Bench 62%, 15,354 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	9x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	7x

SSD
NEO N400 SSD 240GBKlevvBench 68%, 1,111 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
L TA1D0240A 240GBGamerBench 73%, 1,013 samples	4x

RAM
CL19-19-19 D4-2666 2x4GBUnknownBench 80%, 608 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	6x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $135

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16