HP 27-k127c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP 27-k127c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AFA
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 06:03
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4765T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 127
57% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 351
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AFA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.8
3% 4.37 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 125 117 103 132 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 465
Write 449
Mixed 367
SusWrite 118
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 27.3
93% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 118
123% 205 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.3" 1280 720 HWP4227 HP All-in-One
Typical 27-k127c Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 27-k127c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback