Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 03:26
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 674
68% 554 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 0.3
57% 46.8 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 69
Splatting 0.1
32% 44.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1879 1914 1949 1870 1884 1861 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 492GB
38GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 171 160 124 31 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 443
Write 373
Mixed 208
SusWrite 135
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 29.9
70% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 209
178% 258 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 12 24 5.3 12 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 9.7
11% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 214
Write 35
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 34.4
58% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 33.7
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 29.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 120 31.5" 1280 720 SAM71E4 LS32AG55x
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback