Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 20:52
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$95
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 634
64% 518 Pts
64-Core 819
51% 819 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3661) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.5% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 32
21% 30.5 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 31.1
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 400 397 399 414 408 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 406
Mixed 328
SusWrite 403
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 38.3
130% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 246
210% 310 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$80
726GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 162 142 164 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 143
Write 125
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 154
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 113%
HP EG0300FARTT 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: HPDA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Average
Read 124
Write 48.8
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 49.6
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.03 MB/s
HP EG0300FARTT 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: HPDA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 50 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
Read 117
Write 48.9
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 49.5
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 2801 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 48.6
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 48.8
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 24.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2200 F22
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback