Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 17:03
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Memory 49.3
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 49
34% 51 Pts
4-Core 48.1
8-Core 54.1
7% 51.1 Pts
64-Core 48.6
3% 48.6 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 38.7
36% 42 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27.4
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VR SATA3 256G 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 131 42 11 56 9.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20% Poor
Read 180
Write 50.2
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 47.5
18% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 3.3
21% 6.67 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 15
30% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 20%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
440GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 166 162 167 178 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 128
Write 86.1
Mixed 58
SusWrite 167
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 112%
OOS1000G 1TB
429GB free
Firmware: OOS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 119 118 121 130 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 109
Write 95.6
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 120
67% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.5
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 7.2" 1280 720 RGT1352
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback