Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515JF
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210603
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	ARM-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 6805 50 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 61.1 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 129 54% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 202 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1EFF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 6 4% 5.63 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 8.1 6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 10,140 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 213 188 192 170 117 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 1,244 Write 824 Mixed 855 SusWrite 206 174% 782 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 49.4 172% 62.1 MB/s	DQ Read 587 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 493 361% 478 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 189%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB 2,461 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 20.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 17.2 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	38	5	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	362x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	18x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	8x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	269x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	110x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	17x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	119x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	72x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	52x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,191 samples	127x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 12,631 samples	39x
1x8GBWHS84S8AZBench 37%, 60 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16