QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '23 at 14:32
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core 321 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 59 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 171 60% 108 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 676 60% 507 Pts	64-Core 796 49% 796 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 186 Parallax 175 137% 177 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 178 Splatting 125 118% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 198GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 467 Write 340 Mixed 256 78% 354 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 6.8 24% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 64%
Qemu HARDDISK 500GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 286GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 660 Write 401 Mixed 463 112% 508 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 6.6 29% 8.9 MB/s	DQ Read 70.8 DQ Write 55 DQ Mixed 44.6 38% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 81%
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 514 Write 396 Mixed 310 303% 407 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 8.3 1,300% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 101%
Qemu HARDDISK 2.5TB 1TB free Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 475 Write 374 Mixed 153 245% 334 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 5.7 1,058% 6 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x12GB 4,175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	62.2% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 21.9 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 16.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	0	0	60	24"	1280 720	BNQ7925 BenQ EW2430

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16