Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 292
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 885
89% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,144
71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Zotac(19DA 2630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 152
Parallax 137
108% 141 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.9
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 912 27 148 91 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 887
Mixed 893
SusWrite 352
197% 887 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 64.1
217% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 769
DQ Mixed 223
265% 445 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 170%
Great: 242%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
43GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 67 57 53 53 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 501
Write 346
Mixed 338
SusWrite 86.5
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 40.6
147% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 108
131% 230 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
220GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 103 102 105 104 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 91.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 100
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
225GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 125 126 121 119 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 180
Write 189
Mixed 38
SusWrite 119
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST1000NM0033 81Y9807 81Y3867IBM 1TB
613GB free
Firmware: BB58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 153 153 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 151
Mixed 96
SusWrite 153
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AX4U320016G16A-SBKD3 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 29.5
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 29.7
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 24" 1920 1027 GSM5A92 24GM77
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $848
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback