Samsung Galaxy Book Go (Wi-Fi)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive16.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung Galaxy Book Go (Wi-Fi)  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP340XLA-KA3CA
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230117
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 10:04
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.42% Terrible
Memory 7.01
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 30.2
12% 21.4 Pts
4-Core 65.7
8-Core 79.2
9% 72.4 Pts
64-Core 75
5% 75 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KM5V8001DM-B622 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 9.7 8.2 8.4 8.8 9.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.4% Very poor
Read 220
Write 7.5
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 8.7
13% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.8
26% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 6 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB TSOP LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.6
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 0.3
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 580
7% 580 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 21 60 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback