Fujitsu CELSIUS W5011

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive421% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W5011  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault D3917-A1
Memory91.7 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 08:48
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-1390P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 178
2-Core 323
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,132
108% 892 Pts
64-Core 1,646
102% 1,646 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99%
Great: 113%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 136
Parallax 124
97% 126 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 107
Splatting 117
106% 132 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 100%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3027 3006 3017 2718 1682 1712 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
421% Outstanding
Read 2461
Write 3,135
Mixed 2,538
SusWrite 2527
603% 2,665 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 98
320% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,272
DQ Write 1,835
DQ Mixed 1478
1,139% 1,528 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 421%
Great: 442%
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B07 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: GXB7402Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2333 2379 2373 2394 2398 2391 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
405% Outstanding
Read 2,412
Write 2,373
Mixed 2255
SusWrite 2378
531% 2,355 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 93.7
306% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,630
DQ Write 1,409
DQ Mixed 1,499
1,129% 1,513 MB/s
Poor: 255%
This bench: 405%
Great: 461%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CWE 3x31.7GB
3 of 4 slots used
95GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 32.8
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 28.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.8" 1920 1017 PHL0909 PHL 241B7Q
Typical CELSIUS W5011 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W5011

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback