HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8615
Memory4.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191115
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 03:34
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 97.8
44% 72 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 257
27% 219 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 8615) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.28
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6.2
3% 4.9 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 5.6
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RBU-SNS8350DES3128GP 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4040105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 335
Write 299
Mixed 317
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 8.1
46% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 65.6
DQ Mixed 201
136% 171 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 95%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
866GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 55.8
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Adata AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15FD
Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx Builds (Compare 684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback