Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2348M 5,289 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 52 2-Core 95.7 45% 71.9 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 128 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 406 Write 346 Mixed 278 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 7.6 46% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 72.8 DQ Mixed 32.2 40% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
Intenso Basic Line 32GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 2.8 5.4 3 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	4.83% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 0.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 4.2 6% 7.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.83% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB 5,265 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	51	41	60	15.5"	1280 720	SEC4252

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16