HP ZBook 17 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP ZBook 17 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 860C
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 18:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 664
72% 573 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 860C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.4
8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TB
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2002 2102 1485 1501 1517 1520 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,508
Write 2,292
Mixed 1,706
SusWrite 1,688
460% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 74.3
243% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 850
637% 854 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 317%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 24.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD059E
Typical ZBook 17 G6 Builds (Compare 537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback