Alphasync 1126254

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAlphasync 1126254  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 17:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 803
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,222
76% 1,222 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.3% Very good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 127
Parallax 83
74% 100 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 70.7
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 32 17 51 139 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 1
Write 34.3
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 64.3
22% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 31.5" 1280 720 HEC0030 HISENSE
Typical 1126254 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Alphasync 1126254

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback