HP Pro x360 Fortis 11 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP Pro x360 Fortis 11 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B4A
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 124
49% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 237
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8B4A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 6.5
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-3D256-HP 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L432
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 343 320 335 367 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 1,141
Write 796
Mixed 789
SusWrite 347
171% 768 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 14.7
68% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 238
175% 230 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 205%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WC-BCWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 11.6" 1280 720 BOE0AC5
Typical Pro x360 Fortis 11 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro x360 Fortis 11 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback