MSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 09:04
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$68
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 192
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 367
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 35.5
30% 37.4 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 31.1
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lio-org IBLOCK 64GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.5
Write 88.5
Mixed 99.2
21% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 13.3
44% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 130
88% 108 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 25%
Lio-org IBLOCK 3.5TB
617GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 98 95 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 99.3
Write 91.5
Mixed 93
SusWrite 94.8
21% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 14.1
45% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 144
95% 114 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-030.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0853 KG272 S
Typical H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 3,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback