Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 305E4A/305E4A
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '23 at 05:02
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3420M APU 4,510 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 43.8 1-Core 24 2-Core 46.4 25% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 80.4 8-Core 81.5 11% 80.9 Pts	64-Core 83.2 5% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G 8,067 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C624) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 2.6 2% 3.2 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.6 3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB 3,795 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 194 198 198 208 187 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47% Average	Read 214 Write 200 Mixed 191 SusWrite 195 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 19.2 64% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 145 109% 146 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 634 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.3% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5.4 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	55	60	15.5"	1280 720	SEC384A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A

CPU
A6-3420M APUAMDBench 36%, 4,510 samples	30x
A4-3305M APUAMDBench 31%, 1,486 samples	11x
A8-3520M APUAMD $60Bench 38%, 1,349 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6520GAMDBench 2%, 8,067 samples	31x
Radeon HD 6480GAMDBench 2%, 5,005 samples	13x
Radeon HD 6620GAMDBench 3%, 3,311 samples	4x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
UD PRO 256GBGigabyte $49Bench 84%, 2,163 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 479 samples	5x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369