Gigabyte GA-B550 UD AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 UD AC  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 04:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
102% 190 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1,093
103% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,411
87% 1,411 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Zotac(19DA 4633) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 172
Parallax 163
149% 173 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 127
Splatting 115
114% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M450 1TB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 2197 2182 1599 1611 1175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 1,597
Write 2,329
Mixed 1,415
SusWrite 1,832
406% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 68.9
246% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 1,009
DQ Mixed 1,140
850% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 302%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U360038G18I-BB10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 27.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 32.2
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 ACI24A5 VG248
Typical GA-B550 UD AC Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 UD AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback