Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 03:40
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 281
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,016
94% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,403
87% 1,403 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 120
Parallax 126
111% 128 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.8
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1217 1094 1166 1286 1292 1218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,249
Write 1,235
Mixed 1,104
SusWrite 1,212
271% 1,200 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 74.9
274% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,462
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 1,186
914% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 265%
Great: 507%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
305GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2279 2502 2534 1642 326 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 2,464
Write 2,657
Mixed 1,988
SusWrite 1,611
490% 2,180 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 76.1
279% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,534
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,245
951% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 341%
Great: 623%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
569GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 144 144 143 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 176
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 143
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
569GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 169 166 168 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 108
Write 143
Mixed 75
SusWrite 165
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.3
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 36.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR06DC VG271 P
Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback