MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 02:14
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 168
2-Core 328
98% 188 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 858
91% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.4% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 199
Parallax 210
103% 178 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 144
Splatting 92.4
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,335
Write 2,308
Mixed 1,252
368% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 36.3
133% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 733
577% 795 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
188GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 117 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 123
Write 128
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 109
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS728040PLA320 41GB
28GB free
Firmware: PF1OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 35 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 54.3
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 34.7
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
3TB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 130 131 126 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 133
Write 126
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 130
133% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 25
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 24.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2G4
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback