TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro AS -4023S-TRT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro AS -4023S-TRT  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H11DSi-NT
Memory240.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 01:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 62.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 891
79% 669 Pts
64-Core 4,544
281% 4,544 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 72.9%
 Great: 79%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 983 DCT M.2 1.92TB
481GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDA7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 487 586 602 616 630 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,310
Write 974
Mixed 916
SusWrite 529
208% 932 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 32.3
105% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 297
238% 343 MB/s
Poor: 210% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
188% Outstanding
MC Read 76.8
MC Write 57.6
MC Mixed 97.2
221% 77.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 32.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 8 64 0" 1280 720
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback