Acer Nitro AN515-47

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-47  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Jimny_RBH
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 72.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 312
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 838
90% 714 Pts
64-Core 1033
64% 1033 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 159E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.28
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 35.4
16% 26.6 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 27.8
17% 20 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-512G-1014 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61470100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2149 2159 1469 726 792 806 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,573
Write 2,077
Mixed 1,881
SusWrite 1,350
441% 1,970 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 53.7
193% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1056
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 486
417% 634 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 276%
Great: 429%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBSA095N 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical Nitro AN515-47 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Acer Nitro AN515-47

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback