Lenovo 81B0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81B0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime21.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 39.6
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 129
43% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 265
29% 230 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 39F5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.9
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 255 277 308 313 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 1124
Write 865
Mixed 614
SusWrite 292
161% 723 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 28.6
108% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 285
209% 275 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 108%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B2 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO1E3D
Typical 81B0 Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81B0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback