Intel X79M-S

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel X79M-S (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201225
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '23 at 15:49
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 93 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 440 47% 374 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 870B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.9% Good	Lighting 46.7 Reflection 115 Parallax 97.9 38% 86.4 fps	MRender 183 Gravity 118 Splatting 108 108% 136 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 500GB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 391GB free Firmware: W0406A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 242 241 195 222 236 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.6% Good	Read 262 Write 242 Mixed 243 SusWrite 230 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 23.2 103% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 38.2 69% 135 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 133%
Hitachi HTE725050A7E630 500GB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH2OA510 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 67 69 70 76 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 75.8 Write 80.2 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 71.6 45% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7MFR4C 4x8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.2% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 18.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	0	57.8"	1280 720	PHL0000 Philips FTV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	124x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	90x
Xeon E5-2630 v2IntelBench 67%, 1,838 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	35x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSKBench 102%, 33 samples	14x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	58x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	56x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16