Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M740B (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3348-A2
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200213
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '23 at 15:38
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 192 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 192 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 758 67% 570 Pts	64-Core 1,992 123% 1,992 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.2 Parallax 4.6 3% 4.5 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 5 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GB 673 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 53 45 50 46 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 456 Write 407 Mixed 304 SusWrite 57 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 33.6 104% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 294 225% 308 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB 8,393 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 918GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1164 1287 1268 1252 1295 1314 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 1049 1231 1269 1248 1199 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 130%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 923GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 186 186 186 185 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 178 Mixed 104 SusWrite 185 122% 166 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	MC Read 33 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 25.7 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 17.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	24.1"	1920 1137	FUS080F P24W-6 LED

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	10x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	7x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	4x
MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 86%, 673 samples	4x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	3x

RAM
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 124 samples	7x
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 105%, 146 samples	6x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $51Bench 71%, 7,248 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16