PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds) |
Memory | 44.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171030 |
Uptime | 11.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '23 at 15:28 |
Run Duration | 285 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 834 622 621 631 633 629 MB/s
|
181%
Outstanding
|
|||
80.3%
Excellent
|
||||
WD WD8004FRYZ-0 8TB
894GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 254 250 256 258 254 MB/s
|
||||
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
519GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 121 122 122 123 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 166 167 167 169 169 MB/s
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Marvell Raid VD 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 164 165 164 167 166 MB/s
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Marvell Raid VD 4TB
182GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 163 165 163 163 162 MB/s
|
85.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.3%
Very good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 29.8" | 1280 720 | DEL4081 DELL U3014 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 2,898x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 214x |
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples | 184x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 762x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 360x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 295x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $1,056 |