Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231115
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 13:48
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 56.3
1-Core 181
2-Core 361
101% 200 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,046
105% 852 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 99%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ZP2048GV30002 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SUMSS000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,757
Write 3,521
Mixed 2,223
566% 2,500 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 77.2
271% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,280
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 1,116
816% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL3L30CM-BGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 44.4
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 47.4
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 41 203 31 60 0" 1280 720
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback