Acer TravelMate P614-51T-G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate P614-51T-G2  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Piano_CM
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220215
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 12:33
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 207
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 505
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 141D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 7
Parallax 6.7
4% 6.33 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 648 576 622 539 509 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 592
Write 628
Mixed 460
SusWrite 573
127% 563 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 43.1
141% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 621
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 484
347% 456 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 122%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.8% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 20.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 14" 1280 720 AUO253D
Typical TravelMate P614-51T-G2 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P614-51T-G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback