Acer TravelMate P449-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer TravelMate P449-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Pavo_Grus_SK
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 06:25
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 121
51% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 160
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 113D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.5 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 234 239 246 250 251 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 408
Write 249
Mixed 211
SusWrite 243
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 22.5
91% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 179
167% 262 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 40 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14C3
Typical TravelMate P449-M Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P449-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback