TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Monster TULPAR T7 V21.7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V21.7  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V21.7
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 69.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 310
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 908
93% 752 Pts
64-Core 1058
66% 1058 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 90.2%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1146) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 11.5
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 8.22%
 Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,988
Write 3,283
Mixed 2,883
683% 3,051 MB/s
4K Read 79.1
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 113
372% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,433
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1,240
943% 1,276 MB/s
Poor: 166% Great: 433%
WD My Book 1130 1.5TB
328GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 52
Write 27.7
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 30.4
40% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
41% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 16.1%
 Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.4% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 19.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 17.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 66.4%
 Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 17.2" 1280 720 BOE0977
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TULPAR T7 V21.7 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V21.7

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples104x
GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples68x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples35x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples1x
SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples43x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples37x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial  $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples6x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples38x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 2x8GBCrucialBench 80%, 2,776 samples14x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback