Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 385%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 505%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics316% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive585% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 13:57
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 230
2-Core 461
132% 258 Pts
4-Core 916
8-Core 1,687
156% 1,301 Pts
64-Core 4,142
256% 4,142 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 127%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
316% Outstanding
Lighting 458
Reflection 572
Parallax 561
373% 530 fps
MRender 541
Gravity 530
Splatting 313
362% 461 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 316%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT2000T70 2TB
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5959 1324 1363 1087 658 627 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
585% Outstanding
Read 5,822
Write 7,036
Mixed 3,150
SusWrite 1,836
999% 4,461 MB/s
4K Read 89.5
4K Write 343
4K Mixed 137
493% 190 MB/s
DQ Read 2,211
DQ Write 1,758
DQ Mixed 1,961
1,474% 1,976 MB/s
Poor: 312%
This bench: 585%
Great: 829%
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 PRO 2TB
864GB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4488 2468 2093 2100 2188 1911 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
482% Outstanding
Read 2836
Write 4,245
Mixed 2,906
SusWrite 2,541
709% 3,132 MB/s
4K Read 79.9
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 124
419% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2,104
DQ Write 1,658
DQ Mixed 1,876
1,405% 1,880 MB/s
Poor: 271%
This bench: 482%
Great: 660%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
908GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6696 6697 6412 4397 2523 2687 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
770% Outstanding
Read 6,846
Write 6,034
Mixed 3,404
SusWrite 4,902
1,186% 5,296 MB/s
4K Read 73.1
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 113
364% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,995
DQ Write 1757
DQ Mixed 1,805
1,372% 1,852 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 770%
Great: 541%
WD WD5001FFWX-68Z39N0 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 150 151 150 145 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 82.9
Write 150
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 152
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
282% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 122%
Seagate ST16000NM000J-2TW103 16TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 152 153 160 159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 123%
Toshiba MG09ACA18TE 18TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 158 154 161 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 132
Write 146
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 158
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
175% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
181% Outstanding
MC Read 73.6
MC Write 72.1
MC Mixed 68.1
204% 71.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 33.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 181%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 21 60 27" 1280 720 SAM7394 S27C900P
Typical ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 4,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback