Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H610M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 12:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100-$112
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
105% 199 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 778
87% 684 Pts
64-Core 799
49% 799 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.4% Average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 45.3
41% 49.5 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 46.1
39% 48.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Whalekom 256GB 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3215A6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 417 431 195 422 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 504
Write 447
Mixed 393
SusWrite 327
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 3.3
124% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 12
62% 137 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
470GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 110 111 110 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 150
Write 133
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 110
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB3/8 KF432C16BB/8-SP 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 37.3
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 30.1
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B4 SAMSUNG
Typical H610M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback