Asrock Z77 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Performance  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 12:10
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 152
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 191
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 61.1
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 60.9
50% 61.4 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 57.5
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 68 35 44 68 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 403
Write 271
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 80.6
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 0.4
58% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 36.6
84% 168 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 100%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$33
55GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 128 58 52 65 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 288
Write 333
Mixed 324
SusWrite 107
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 14.8
68% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 29.1
78% 161 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
106GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 211 225 230 232 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.9% Good
Read 236
Write 229
Mixed 222
SusWrite 219
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 27.7
110% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 124
98% 138 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
190GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 71 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 70.1
Mixed 46
SusWrite 70.6
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 17 60 26" 1280 720 ORN0000 CLB32B860DS
Typical Z77 Performance Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback