PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Performance (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120301 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '23 at 12:10 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
59.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intenso SSD 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 68 35 44 68 67 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$33
55GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 128 58 52 65 68 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
106GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 211 225 230 232 238 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
190GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 71 70 71 71 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 50 | 17 | 60 | 26" | 1280 720 | ORN0000 CLB32B860DS |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 48x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 35x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 26x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 11x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $209 |