Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150602
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '23 at 11:55
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150-$41 36,627 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 87 2-Core 154 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 236 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84F6) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 7.7 Parallax 1.3 4% 4.53 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate STM3320418AS 320GB 768 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 23 23 15 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Read 3.5 Write 9.5 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 20.5 10% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 60%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 56GB free Firmware: 78.06E.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 64 62 64 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 56.9 Write 57.4 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 63.6 40% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 104%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB 11,393 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 101GB free Firmware: FH100-05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 64 71 80 70 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 81 Write 72.7 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 70.1 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	2	58	1	70	0"	1280 720	Default

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	464x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	303x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	202x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	173x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	138x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16