Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 10:15
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6098P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 175
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 257
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 8.9
6% 8.07 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.2
5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 191 205 214 198 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 399
Write 206
Mixed 181
SusWrite 203
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 29.2
108% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 115
120% 199 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKE800UD51208-2133AH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 116 29 60 17" 1280 961 BNQ7801 BenQ G700
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 2,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback