Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '23 at 02:34
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 176 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 479 51% 407 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 62.3 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 58.9 51% 62.2 fps	MRender 58.9 Gravity 61.4 Splatting 59 49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 133 139 139 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 320 Write 213 Mixed 224 SusWrite 137 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 30.5 105% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 145 110% 147 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 19GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 162 109 108 90 88 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.6% Above average	Read 236 Write 228 Mixed 40 SusWrite 131 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 16.8 84% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 111 105% 163 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 88%
Wintec SF-2281 240GB SSD 19 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 46GB free Firmware: 507ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 134 140 142 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 308 Write 214 Mixed 225 SusWrite 139 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 28.3 102% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 139 113% 163 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 82%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 63GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 99 113 98 108 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 109 Write 109 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 105 73% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 901GB free Firmware: SC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 153 148 153 156 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 59.6 Write 114 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 151 69% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 0.8 241% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 374GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 56 56 56 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 116 Write 102 Mixed 80 SusWrite 56.3 66% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 67%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$179 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 10GB free Firmware: SC61 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 223 Write 201 Mixed 102 129% 175 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.4 818% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB 515 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18.9 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	72.3"	1280 720	GSM0001 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	160x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	153x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	22x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16