MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory14.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 02:01
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 240
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 702
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 1,011
63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.4% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 80
Parallax 75.4
56% 74.6 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 65
Splatting 63.5
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 35 18 28 15 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 248
Write 95.2
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 46.3
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 10.8
46% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 100
72% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 100%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
893GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2949 2921 1925 1493 1480 1461 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,674
Write 3,180
Mixed 2,822
SusWrite 2,038
605% 2,678 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 97.1
316% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 998
DQ Mixed 1,089
820% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 379%
Great: 526%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
253GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 155 160 161 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 116
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 159
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
395GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 168 164 170 173 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 117
Write 126
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 170
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
64.6% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 25.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 24.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 5R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 218 60 165 31.5" 1920 1017 AUS32C3 ASUS VG328
Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,053
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback