Asus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 363%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 480%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics293% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 23:39
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 82.2
1-Core 237
2-Core 475
135% 264 Pts
4-Core 951
8-Core 1,836
165% 1,394 Pts
64-Core 4,185
259% 4,185 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 8901) ≥ 4GB; asus pro art geforce 4080 16gb
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
293% Outstanding
Lighting 440
Reflection 422
Parallax 453
359% 438 fps
MRender 544
Gravity 364
Splatting 261
304% 390 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 293%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4487
Write 4,867
Mixed 3,347
945% 4,234 MB/s
4K Read 85.6
4K Write 326
4K Mixed 116
451% 176 MB/s
DQ Read 2,587
DQ Write 2,138
DQ Mixed 2,327
1,752% 2,351 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 598%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 176 176 176 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 188
Write 193
Mixed 77
SusWrite 176
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 1.7
2% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
165% Outstanding
MC Read 65.8
MC Write 65.5
MC Mixed 61.6
184% 64.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 51.3
SC Mixed 30.3
98% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 165%
Great: 276%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 27" 1280 720 HWP3355 HP 27wm
Typical Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 451%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 595%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback