Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive434% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 21:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 72.8
1-Core 201
2-Core 398
115% 224 Pts
4-Core 761
8-Core 1,376
128% 1,068 Pts
64-Core 2,608
161% 2,608 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 170F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 11.1
8% 12 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3822 1854 733 748 749 749 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
434% Outstanding
Read 4,317
Write 3,916
Mixed 2,422
SusWrite 1,443
675% 3,024 MB/s
4K Read 79.2
4K Write 283
4K Mixed 87
381% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,422
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 1,278
965% 1298 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 434%
Great: 480%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 35.2
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 20
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 102%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 214 59 165 16" 1536 960 AUOD7A7
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback